Tributary To McLeod Lake - 198669 - Appendix

Site Location

PSCIS crossings 198669 is located on Tributary To McLeod Lake, approximately 13km south of the community of McLeod Lake, BC (Figure 5.8). The crossing is located 250m upstream of McLeod Lake, on the Hart Highway, and is within the Carp River watershed group. Crossing 198669 is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (chris_culvert_id: 1996861).


 my_caption <- "Map of Tributary to McLeod Lake"
 
 knitr::include_graphics("fig/gis/map_mcleod.jpeg")
Map of Tributary to McLeod Lake

Figure 5.8: Map of Tributary to McLeod Lake


Background

At this location, Tributary To McLeod Lake is a third order stream and drains a watershed of approximately 6.8km2. The watershed ranges in elevation from a maximum of 1004m to 682m near the crossing (Table 5.7).


In 2023, crossing 198669 was assessed with a fish passage assessment and was prioritized for follow-up with a habitat confirmation assessment due to the extremely poor condition and size of the culvert, and the presence of quality habitat observed upstream (Irvine and Winterscheidt 2024). A habitat confirmation assessment was subsequently conducted in 2024. Upstream of the highway, rainbow trout have previously been recorded (Norris [2018] 2024; MoE 2024). In 2024, a second crossing (PSCIS 199664) was assessed approximately 2.1km upstream of the Hart Highway crossing, and was located on an unnamed FSR.


fpr::fpr_table_wshd_sum(site_id = my_site) |>
  fpr::fpr_kable(caption_text = paste0('Summary of derived upstream watershed statistics for PSCIS crossing ', my_site, '.'),
           footnote_text = 'Elev P60 = Elevation at which 60% of the watershed area is above',
           scroll = F)
Table 5.7: Summary of derived upstream watershed statistics for PSCIS crossing 198669.
Site Area Km Elev Site Elev Min Elev Max Elev Median Elev P60 Aspect
198669 6.8 682 682 1004 867 843 SSW
* Elev P60 = Elevation at which 60% of the watershed area is above


A summary of habitat modelling outputs for the crossing are presented in Table 5.8. A map of the watershed is provided in map attachment 093J.123.


fpr::fpr_table_bcfp(scroll = F) 
Table 5.8: Summary of fish habitat modelling for PSCIS crossing 198669.
Habitat Potential Remediation Gain Remediation Gain (%)
BT Rearing (km) 4.9 2.1 43
BT Spawning (km) 3.4 2.1 62
BT Network (km) 14.5 3.9 27
BT Stream (km) 13.3 3.9 29
BT Lake Reservoir (ha) 2.3 0.0 0
BT Wetland (ha) 4.2 0.0 0
BT Slopeclass03 (km) 1.8 0.5 28
BT Slopeclass05 (km) 4.7 2.1 45
BT Slopeclass08 (km) 3.8 1.2 32
BT Slopeclass15 (km) 3.2 0.1 3
* Model data is preliminary and subject to adjustments.


Stream Characteristics at Crossing 198669

At the time of the 2024 assessment, PSCIS crossing 198669 on the Hart Highway was un-embedded, non-backwatered and ranked as a barrier to upstream fish passage according to the provincial protocols (MoE 2011) (Table 5.9). The culvert had a 0.36m outlet drop, a 1m deep outlet pool, and was in extremely poor condition with approximately 2m of the culvert unraveling at the outlet. There were signs of significant erosion around the pipe inlet, suggesting the culvert is undersized for the stream.


The water temperature was 11\(^\circ\)C, pH was 8.3 and conductivity was 430 uS/cm.


# fpr::fpr_table_cv_summary_memo()

lfpr_table_cv_summary_memo()
Table 5.9: Summary of fish passage assessment for PSCIS crossing 198669.
Location and Stream Data
Crossing Characteristics
Date 2024-09-05 Crossing Sub Type Round Culvert
PSCIS ID 198669 Diameter (m) 0.9
External ID Length (m) 42
Crew LS AI Embedded No
UTM Zone 10 Depth Embedded (m)
Easting 503347 Resemble Channel No
Northing 6085960 Backwatered No
Stream Tributary To McLeod Lake Percent Backwatered
Road Hart Highway Fill Depth (m) 8
Road Tenure MoTi Outlet Drop (m) 0.36
Channel Width (m) 3.5 Outlet Pool Depth (m) 1
Stream Slope (%) 2 Inlet Drop Yes
Beaver Activity No Slope (%) 2
Habitat Value Medium Valley Fill Deep Fill
Final score 37 Barrier Result Barrier
Fix type Replace Structure with Streambed Simulation CBS Fix Span / Diameter 4.5
Comments: The culvert was in extremely poor condition, with approximately 2m of the culvert unraveling at the outlet, a deep outlet pool and significant erosion around the pipe inlet, indicating that the culvert is severely undersized for the stream. Fish were observed downstream, and rainbow trout are documented upstream in FISS. Good habitat consisting of pools and gravels were observed downstream. A substantial amount of road fill is present. The inlet was blocked by a log and debris creating an inlet drop. There were signs of significant erosion around the pipe inlet, suggesting the culvert is undersized for the stream. MoTi chris_culvert_id: 1996861
Photos: From top left clockwise: Road/Site Card, Barrel, Outlet, Downstream, Upstream, Inlet.


##this is useful to get some comments for the report
hab_site |>filter(site == my_site & location == 'ds') |>pull(comments)
hab_site |>filter(site == my_site & location == 'us') |>pull(comments)

Stream Characteristics Downstream of Crossing 198669

The stream was surveyed downstream from crossing 198669 for 250m , to the confluence with McLeod Lake. The stream had frequent pools, good cover, and abundant gravels, providing medium value habitat for overwintering and spawning fish. Beaver activity was visible and fish were observed the entire length of the survey (Figure 5.9). Total cover amount was rated as abundant with undercut banks dominant. Cover was also present as small woody debris, large woody debris, deep pools, and overhanging vegetation.The average channel width was 3.4m, the average wetted width was 1.5m, and the average gradient was 1.6%.The dominant substrate was cobbles with gravels sub-dominant.


Stream Characteristics Upstream of Crossing 198669

The stream was surveyed upstream from crossing 198669 for 550m (Figure 5.10). Abundant gravels were present throughout the lower section, providing suitable spawning habitat. Near the powerline corridor, substrate composition transitioned to predominantly fines. Approximately 100m upstream of the transmission line, a 1.2m high beaver dam created a backwatered area. Numerous fish, ranging from 40-120mm, were observed throughout the surveyed section up to the beaver dam. Upstream of the impounded area, the stream returned to predominantly gravel substrates with frequent pools up to 40cm deep. Total cover amount was rated as moderate with undercut banks dominant. Cover was also present as small woody debris, large woody debris, deep pools, and overhanging vegetation.The average channel width was 3.7m, the average wetted width was 2.4m, and the average gradient was 2.5%.The dominant substrate was gravels with fines sub-dominant. The habitat was rated as medium value for salmonid spawning and rearing.


Approximately 2.1km upstream of the Hart Highway crossing, PSCIS crossing 199664 was located on an unnamed FSR. The crossing was ranked as a barrier to upstream fish passage according to the provincial protocols (MoE 2011). The culvert was poorly installed and in a deteriorated condition, resulting in significant upstream water backup. Habitat was considered medium value, characterized by dense riparian vegetation including shrubs and ferns. Detailed results are provided in Appendix - Phase 1 Fish Passage Assessment Data and Photos.


Structure Remediation and Cost Estimate

Should restoration/maintenance activities proceed, replacement of the Hart Highway crossing with a bridge (4.5 m span) is recommended. At the time of reporting in 2025, the cost of the work is estimated at $ 1,500,000.


Conclusion

Approximately 5km of bull trout rearing habitat is modelled upstream, and the habitat was rated as medium value for resident salmonid spawning and rearing. The culvert was in extremely poor condition, with a deep outlet pool and significant erosion around the pipe inlet, indicating that the culvert is severely undersized for the stream. The moderate outlet drop likely inhibits juvenile fish passage. The crossing is a moderate priority for replacement. Due to this crossing being situated on the Hart Highway, construction would be complex and costly. Approximately 2.1km upstream, PSCIS crossing 199664 was also ranked as a barrier according to provincial protocols, with medium value habitat present at the crossing.



tab_hab_summary |>
  dplyr::filter(Site %in% c(my_site)) |> 
  fpr::fpr_kable(caption_text = paste0("Summary of habitat details for PSCIS crossings ", my_site, "."),
                 scroll = F) 
Table 5.10: Summary of habitat details for PSCIS crossings 198669.
Site Location Length Surveyed (m) Average Channel Width (m) Average Wetted Width (m) Average Pool Depth (m) Average Gradient (%) Total Cover Habitat Value
198669 Downstream 250 3.4 1.5 0.3 1.6 abundant medium
198669 Upstream 550 3.7 2.4 0.4 2.5 moderate medium


my_photo1 = fpr::fpr_photo_pull_by_str(str_to_pull = 'ds_typical_1_')

my_caption1 = paste0('Typical habitat downstream of PSCIS crossing ', my_site, '.')
knitr::include_graphics(my_photo1)
Typical habitat downstream of PSCIS crossing 198669.

Figure 5.9: Typical habitat downstream of PSCIS crossing 198669.


my_photo2 = fpr::fpr_photo_pull_by_str(str_to_pull = 'us_typical_2')

my_caption2 = paste0('Typical habitat upstream of PSCIS crossing ', my_site, '.')
knitr::include_graphics(my_photo2)
Typical habitat upstream of PSCIS crossing 198669.

Figure 5.10: Typical habitat upstream of PSCIS crossing 198669.

my_caption <- paste0('Left: ', my_caption1, ' Right: ', my_caption2)

knitr::include_graphics(my_photo1)
knitr::include_graphics("fig/pixel.png")
knitr::include_graphics(my_photo2)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo=FALSE, message=FALSE, warning=FALSE)
source('scripts/packages.R')
source('scripts/tables.R')
source('scripts/functions.R')
my_site <- 198692